logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2020.09.02 2020나24563
기타(금전)
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

Reasons

1. 0, 00, 40, 00, 000, 000, 40, 00, 000, 000, 40, 000, 000, 000, 000, 000, 000, 000, 000, 10,0000, 10,0000, 18,000, 18,000, 18,000, 00, 18,000, 40, 00, 18,000, 00, 00, 18,000, 00, 00, 00, 00, 000, 40,000, 88,000, 40,000,000 won

A. On August 13, 2018, the Defendant: (a) as the broker of the Plaintiff, a licensed real estate agent, on the part of August 13, 2018, discovered a residential building to conduct a quasi-public rental business; (b) purchased each of the instant real estate under the condition that the sales contract takes over the obligation of lease deposit (hereinafter referred to as “instant sales contract”) separately for each household, and prepared a total of 12 contracts from C and D (hereinafter referred to as “sellers”); (c) but (d) in fact, the Defendant paid the sales contract to the seller the down payment.

At the time of the above contract, the brokerage commission between the plaintiff and the defendant was set as follows:

Article 7. Licensed real estate agents shall be parties to a contract.

arrow