A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. If a buried cultural heritage asset violates the Act on Protection and Inspection of Buried Cultural Heritage, the deceased or the owner, possessor, or manager of the area of the buried cultural heritage asset shall not change the present state and report the discovery to the Administrator of the Cultural Heritage Administration, and shall not conceal, dispose of, or change the present state without reporting it;

A. A. Around March 30, 2010, the Defendant, at “C himself/herself’s summary” located in Gumi-si, U.S.A.A., changed the phenomenon by treating the discovery without reporting to the Administrator of the Cultural Heritage Administration, even though he/she discovered a total of 20 points, such as 12 points of buried cultural heritage in attached Table 1 [in the form of “influence No. 1,” the portion of “influence No. 1,” which is a buried cultural heritage, i.e., an influence of an influence of an influence of an influence,

B. Around April 8, 2010, the Defendant of the crime in D’s summary of “D self-satise” found 20 points, including 7 points of buried cultural heritage in the attached Table 2 [In the form of “Insatise Nos. 1,” the part of “Insatise Nos. 1,” is modified in the form of “Insatise Nos. 1,” which is a buried cultural heritage,” and changed the phenomenon by training without reporting to the Administrator of the Cultural Heritage Administration.

C. On October 2010, the Defendant found three points of buried cultural heritage as indicated in the attached Table 3 [No. 56, 67 of the Bail No. 96, 97 of the total list of seized cultural heritage, respectively] of the crime committed in the name of the Si/Gun/Gu, the Defendant changed the phenomenon as a result of training without reporting the fact to the Administrator of the Cultural Heritage Administration.

2. Forgery of private documents and the display of private documents;

A. On September 27, 2013, the Defendant forged a private document under the name of “E”, namely, F, Sinsi, 107 Dong 1302.