logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
광주고등법원(제주) 2015.07.01 2014누399
증여세부과처분취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the court’s explanation concerning this case is as follows, and the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is the same as that of the part concerning the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the modification as set forth below. Thus, it shall be cited as it is in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act

The second 4th 2th 2th 2th 20 " was changed to " February 1, 2012." "B 3 through 7th 3th 4th 3rd 4th 201 and "B 3th 15th 1,2, and 3th 14th 3th 3th 12 "the Plaintiff continues to exist" from "B 3th 12th 12th 3th 30,000, 75 million won to "D 46,000,000, 76,000,000 won to E, August 16, 2012, 201, and most of the above 3th 10th 7th 3th 3th 7th 10,000 local government's cashier's checks were changed to "the Plaintiff was actually returned to E,00,000 won on the date of deposit."

2. In conclusion, the judgment of the first instance is legitimate, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.