본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
대법원 1976. 4. 13. 선고 75다1816 판결
Main Issues

The validity of the registration where the intermediate omission registration was already passed without agreement but the sales contract was duly formed between the parties concerned.

Summary of Judgment

In the case where the intermediate omission registration has already been passed through, unless the sales contract has been duly concluded between the parties concerned, the registration shall not be deemed null and void only on the ground that there has been no agreement on the intermediate omission registration.




Defendant 1 and one other


[Defendant, Appellant] Korea-Japan Bank

original decision

Daegu High Court Decision 73Na712 delivered on July 29, 1975


The appeal is dismissed. The costs of appeal are assessed against the plaintiff.


Judgment on the grounds for appeal by the Plaintiff administrator;

If all the evidences cited by the original judgment are examined by comparison with the records, it is sufficient to accept the fact of recognition as the original judgment as the result of the original judgment. Thus, the original judgment is just and it is sufficient to accept the fact of the original judgment. Thus, the original judgment is deemed that the seal of the plaintiff No. 6-1 (sales Contract) with the plaintiff No. 7-1, No. 7-2 (S. Hongjin), which points out the plaintiff's title, is identical, and the above Eul's above evidence No. 7 is recognized, and the above evidence and other evidences are comprehensively taken into account, and the ten persons such as the plaintiff who is China and China, etc., are 10 in Daegu City No. 20 (1921) 5.6, Daegu City No. 1921) which concluded that the plaintiff had no influence on the establishment of an interim sale contract as the representative of the non-party, and thus, the court below's judgment did not contain any error in the misapprehension of the legal relationship of the plaintiff's title and the non-party's share in its interim sale registration.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. The costs of appeal are assessed against the losing party. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.

Justices Han-jin (Presiding Justice)


- 대법원 1979. 7. 10. 선고 79다847 판결 [집27(2)민,166;공1979.9.15.(616),12074]


- 박재윤 중간생략의 약정에 의한 등기청구와 매매계약의 합의 해제 민사판례연구 4권 / 박영사 1982

- 이수기 중간생략등기청구권과 중간등기생략의 합의 판례연구 3집 / 부산판례연구회 1993

- 고창현 중간생략등기의 유효성과 등기청구권 민사재판의 제문제(상) : 송천 이시윤박사화갑기념논문집 (95.10) / 박영사 1995

- 고창현 중간생략등기의 법리 법학의 현대적 제문제 : 덕암김병대교수화갑기념논문집 (98.02) / 대흥기획 1998

- 배병일 중간생략등기 월간고시 19권 6호 (92.05) / 법지사 1992

- 배병일 등기청구권 토지법학 9호 / 한국토지법학회 1993

- 양재모 부동산 소유권이전등기에 관한 특별조치법제정의 필요성 부동산법학 10집 / 한국부동산법학회 2004

- 심재돈 실체관계에 부합하는 등기 재판자료 43집 (상) / 법원행정처 1988

- 이보환 중간생략등기 재판자료 43집 (상) / 법원행정처 1988

- 김형수 중간생략등기와 규제법 법학논총 3집 / 조선대학교 법학연구소 1997

- 신성구 ‘실체관계에 부합하는 등기‘의 법리 : 「실체관계의 법리에 관한 연구 - 부동산물권변동을 중심으로」중에서 법무사 534호 / 대한법무사협회 2011

- 엄동섭 중간생략등기합의의 법적 성질 민사판례연구 28권 / 박영사 2006

- 고창현 중간생략등기의 효력과 등기청구권 법학논총 4집 / 조선대학교 법학연구소 1998

- 김증한 물권적 기대권론 현대민법론 (82.11) / 고시원 1982

- 김용호 중간생략등기에 관한 소고 법학논총 25집 / 단국대학교 2001


대법원 1969.7.8. 선고 69다648 판결


- 대구고등법원 1975.7.29. 선고 73나712 판결