logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
서울남부지방법원 2018.02.23 2016가단223566
손해배상(기)
Text

1. Defendants B, E, H, M, andO jointly do so to the Plaintiff and jointly do so from May 7, 2015 to February 23, 2018.

Reasons

1. Determination as to the claim against Defendant B, E, H, M, andO

가. 손해배상책임의 발생 갑 제1호증의 1 내지 3, 갑 제2 내지 4호증, 갑 제6호증의 각 기재 및 증인 Q의 증언에 변론 전체의 취지를 종합하면, 피고 B, E, H, M, O은 2015. 5. 7. 03:00경 서울 강서구 R에 있는 S 뒤편 T 앞 사거리 도로상에서 원고에게 “뭘 쳐다봐”라고 말하며 시비를 건 후 이에 항의하는 원고를 공동으로 폭행하여 요추부 제2, 3 요추 좌측 횡돌기 골절 등의 상해를 입힌 사실을 인정할 수 있고 반증이 없다.

According to the above facts of recognition, the defendants who committed joint tort are jointly liable for damages suffered by the plaintiff.

B. Under the scope of liability for damages is discarded, and the current value calculation at the time of the accident shall be based on the method of deducting intermediate interest at the rate of 5/12 percent per month.

(1) Personal information (A) the date on which an accident occurred: The date on which an accident occurred: May 7, 2015; the date on which an accident ends on May 23, 2058; the maximum working age: 60 years; and the end of operation: August 11, 2043: The urban daily wage of an ordinary worker; the number of working days during the period of operation: 1) the rate of working capacity for each period from May 7, 2015 to May 20, 2015; 1) the rate of working capacity of the Plaintiff from May 7, 2015 to May 20, 200; 24% from May 21, 2015 to May 21, 2015; 2) the medical record of the Plaintiff’s medical treatment expenses for each period of 10% from May 21, 2015 to May 20, 2015.

(3) In light of all the circumstances, such as the parts and degree of the Plaintiff’s injury caused by the instant case, the progress of treatment, the details and necessity of the nursing, etc., it is reasonable to deem that the Plaintiff was in need of the opening of one adult female for eight hours a day between two weeks (14 days) and that the amount is the same.