The judgment of the first instance shall be modified as follows:

A. The Defendant’s acquisition intervenor shall be the Plaintiff and the 281m2, Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-do.

1. The reasons for the admitting the reasons for the judgment of the first instance are stated by the court, which is the second instance of the judgment of the first instance;

A. 2) The facts of recognition are modified as follows, and the defendant 3 or less "the defendant" is modified as "the intervenor accepting the defendant" (with the exception of the change of the defendant 3 or less).

1. The reasoning for the judgment of the first instance is the same as that for the judgment of the first instance, and thus, this is cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act

[2] On April 2014, the Defendant: (a) purchased and possessed a wooden flag that was set up on the ground of D land, C land, and F land (F land shall have ownership prior to the transfer of ownership in the name of E); and (b) building 2, a wooden building 1, a fence, and a fence (hereinafter the above each building and fence collectively referred to as “the instant housing”); and (c) sold the instant housing to the Defendant’s acquisition intervenor during the instant lawsuit; and (d) as of the closing date of pleadings in the instant lawsuit, the Defendant Intervenor owned and occupied the instant housing as of the date of the conclusion of pleadings in the instant case.

2. The plaintiff's claim for conclusion must be accepted on the ground of the reasons.

In the appellate trial, the decision of the first instance court is modified as ordered by the defendant's successor to the housing of this case, following the acceptance of the lawsuit by the defendant.