logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 2014.08.26 2014고정276
업무상배임
Text

The sentence of sentence against the defendant shall be suspended.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who, from April 14, 2010, worked as the head of the guest room operation team of the F hotel operated by the victim E, a company located in the window D in Changwon-si from April 14, 2010, has been engaged in the passenger room reservation and accommodation service for guests who are accommodated in the hotel.

When the defendant allows a customer to use the guest room with special discount as a head of the guest room operation team, he/she has a duty to obtain the consent of the general manager, despite the fact that there is a duty to obtain the consent of the general manager, the defendant, in violation of his/her duty, applies the application of the special authorization to sell the guest room to the hotel hotel G on May 17, 2013 without the consent of the general manager, and from that time, from that time as shown in the list of crimes committed in the same year.

7. up to 13. Up to 13. A total of 13 occasions, the hotel was opened to 13 guests and used a hotel with special approval.

As a result, the Defendant violated his duties, thereby obtaining 1,430,000 won (170,000 won x 13 times x 60,000 x 13 times) from 13 hotel guests, and thereby causing damage to the same amount as the above hotel.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of the witness H and I;

1. Application of the police interrogation protocol to the defendant

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Articles 356 and 355 (2) of the Criminal Act concerning the choice of punishment;

2. Fine of 500,000 won to be suspended; and

3. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act (50,000 won per day) of the Criminal Act for the inducement of a workhouse.

4. Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act (Article 59(1) of the suspended sentence (Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act (Article 59(1) of the same Act (Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act), which is the first offender who has

arrow