logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 2018.11.21 2018고단751
사전자기록등위작등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On March 23, 2018, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for habitual larceny, etc. at the Chuncheon District Court on March 23, 2018 and the said judgment became final and conclusive on March 26, 2018.

1. On November 25, 2016, the Defendant committed a crime on November 25, 2016: (a) entered the “D”, “E”, “E”, “F”, and “A” into the customer name column of the online mobile phone new application form using the Ashmon in order to interfere with the affairs in the “C” located in the city of Cheongju on November 25, 2016; and (b) drafted an online mobile phone application form in the name of the private electronic archives pertaining to the rights and duties of the deposit owner; and (c) sent the online mobile phone application form in the name of the KT security system transmission network as if it was duly established.

2. A crime committed on November 29, 2016;

A. On November 29, 2016, the Defendant: (a) entered the ID’s “D”, “E”, and “A” into the customer name column of the online mobile phone; (b) forged the online mobile phone new application in the name of “D”, “E”, and “A” in the deposit owner name column; and (c) sent the online mobile phone new application in the name of “D”, which is a private electronic document pertaining to the rights and obligations, to the said place to the KT security system transmission network as if it was duly established.

B. The Defendant stated “D”, “H”, and “friendly” in the official column with the nominal owner in the letter of application for automatic transfer at the time and place indicated in the above paragraph A, and submitted to the head of the agency I as if he was a document duly formed with the intent of exercising D’s signature, and used the letter of application for automatic transfer in the name of D, a private document pertaining to rights and obligations, for the purpose of forging D’s signature.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of suspect by the police against J;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. Written petition of D;

1. Application form for cell phone subscription, investigation report (in addition to suspected persons and report).

arrow