The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

The gist of the defendant's appeal is that the court below's punishment (6 months of imprisonment, 2 years of suspended execution, 120 hours of community service order) is too unreasonable.

It is recognized that there was no criminal record except for the punishment of a fine of KRW 500,000 due to a violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (joint injury) in 2011, and that the alteration and alteration of the official document did not lead to the appointment of the E company as security service providers.

However, each of the crimes of this case is deemed unfair since the court below's punishment is too large and it is not reasonable in light of various sentencing conditions shown in the arguments of this case, such as the defendant's age, career, sexual conduct, and the circumstance and result of each of the crimes of this case, by modifying an inquiry of the rate of workplace which is an official document, selecting a security service company by bidding for the selection of the security service company. Thus, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

Therefore, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, since there is no ground for appeal by the defendant. It is so decided as per Disposition.