logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 2020.11.03 2020구합50919
징계처분취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. From April 12, 2019 to November 28, 2019, the Plaintiff served as a general analysis officer at the Information Resource Center B as a general analysis officer.

B. On December 19, 2019, the Defendant imposed a disciplinary action for one month of salary reduction (hereinafter “instant disposition”) on the Plaintiff pursuant to Article 56 of the Military Personnel Management Act on the following grounds:

The name of disciplinary action: Facts of violation of the duty to maintain dignity (sexual harassment) and disciplinary action;

1. On November 11, 2019, around 19:10, the official questions proposed by the victim D, who is a civilian military employee, shall be examined at the Information Staff Office of the Army Information Staff Team in the Incheoncheon-gun, Gangwon-do.

In response to the question of the established rules on which security measures are based, the victim confirmed the established rules in order to answer the question, stating that the victim "I't see that the rules have been in accordance with the regulations on private sector administration," and that the victim did not have any time to see the established rules, following the initial nature of the name of the executive members, such as planning and judgment officer E, and the name of the executive members of the victim and the sexual intercourse relationship with the victim in the presence of four executives, such as the captain of planning and judgment officer E, etc., and that the victim seems to have "F and to have time to see, ? there is no time to

(hereinafter “Disciplinary Reason No. 1”) around 09:00 on November 13, 2019, on the ground that, while holding a meeting at the 209:0 on the Kancheon-gun ASIC Situation Office of the Army, the number of executive officers of the Information Team at the 2nd Kancheon-gun, Gangwon-do, the victim asked the victim of the results of security inspection conducted at the stage to which the same association belongs to the same association, and the victim respondeds to the small voice, the number of us seems to be “I special?”

(hereinafter “Disciplinary Reason 2”) around 16:00 on November 17, 2019, around 16:00, the victim was seated in the location of the victim of the information gathering office of the Army Information Team in the Seocheon-gun, Gangwon-do, Seocheon-do (hereinafter “Disciplinary Reason 2”) and the victim, who was seated in the said location, i “deduction” in small shape, i.e., the victim’s face should be taken as hand, and the victim’s face should be pushed down, so the victim was able to receive it, and the victim’s hand should not be able to write down.

arrow