Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, from the date of the final judgment of this case, each of the above two years against the Defendants.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendants provided that the victims D would be able to establish the F Saemaul Community Credit Cooperative in Sejong-si E, and received money from the police officers in the middle of April 2013 for the use of expenses from the victims. On May 2013, the Defendants called the victims that “Around May 2013, it is necessary to establish the Saemaul Community Credit Cooperative in Sejong-si, and KRW 30 million with the street funds.”

However, even if the Defendants received money from the injured party, they did not have the intention or ability to pay for the establishment of the F Saemaul Bank to the Sejong City Cho Jong, and they would have used most of the money from the injured party to pay for the obligations of the Defendant A.

Accordingly, the Defendants conspired to induce the victim as above, and acquired the total amount of KRW 30 million from June 7, 2013 to the Agricultural Cooperative Account in the name of G, the spouse of Defendant A, and KRW 28 million from June 10, 2013 to the Agricultural Cooperative Account in the name of Defendant B, the spouse of Defendant B.

Summary of Evidence

1. The Defendants’ respective legal statements (as at the second public trial date) 1.D protocol; 1. In the investigation report (in the case of a witness I telephone conversations report), investigation report (in the case of a witness I telephone conversations report) and recording files;

1. Recording on recording: 1. Investigation Report (Attachment of Details of G Deposit and Financing Transactions); G Nonghyup Account Transactions; 1. Investigation Report (Attachment of Documents of H Deposit and Financing Transactions); Application of statutes on HF Account Transactions;

1. Relevant Articles 347(1) and 347(1) and 30 of the Criminal Act concerning the Defendants who choose to commit the crime;

1. Defendants subject to suspended sentence: The grounds for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (hereinafter referred to as the grounds for sentencing, taking into account favorable circumstances among the grounds for sentencing);

1. Reduction of a mitigation area (from one year to one year) (special sentencing person) within the scope of a recommended punishment on the sentencing criteria [the types of decisions] under the sentencing criteria, the scope of a punishment [the types of punishment shall be determined] in general fraud, and where significant damage has been restored;

2. The defendants conspired to make a decision of sentence to the injured party.