Defendant

A Imprisonment for a year and April, and Defendant B’s agricultural partnership corporation shall be punished by a fine of KRW 7,00,000, respectively.

Defendant

B.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

B An agricultural partnership (hereinafter referred to as “B”) is a corporation established for the purpose of manufacturing, research, development, distribution, and sales of alcoholic beverages and alcoholic ingredients using agricultural products produced in the adjoining area of Gyeongnam-gun on October 8, 2008, and Defendant A is a person who actually operates Defendant B.

Defendant

B was selected as D installation operators with the total project cost of KRW 960 million ( KRW 480,000,000, KRW 966,000,000, military expenses, KRW 96,000,000, KRW 288,000,000,000) in the specialized product promotion projects organized by the Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry for agricultural and fishery products, and with the subsidies of the above countries, “D” was established using subsidies.

1. Defendant A

A. On April 201, the Defendant entered into a contract with E (the nominal owner F; hereinafter “E”) located in Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun and the total construction cost of KRW 265 million with the construction cost of the E (the nominal owner F; hereinafter “E”) after the Defendant’s construction work was selected as the operator of the specialized product promotion project, which was operated by the Defendant.

B In order to receive a subsidy from the Chang-gun Office (the Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry entrusted the implementation of a subsidy from the Ministry of Fishery Food) the documents evidencing that the Defendant paid the subsidy to the Chang-gun Office. The Defendant: (a) has no money to prepare the said subsidy; (b) has manipulatedd the payment of the subsidy by receiving money from E and remitting the money to E; and (c) has received the document from the Chang-gun Office by submitting it to the Chang-gun Office; and (d) has received the subsidy from the Chang-gun Office.

The defendant would first receive subsidies and return the above KRW 100 million to G who is a substantial operator of E.

“A request for dismissal was made on April 28, 201, G is made in the name of H’s account in the name of H A, the representative director of B around April 28, 201 (I, once again, transfers KRW 50 million to the Agricultural Cooperative in the name of B), and B.