The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The gist of the reasons for appeal is that the original court’s punishment (one year and six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable;

2. The crime of this case is determined by taking account of the following facts: (a) the Defendant, as if he had been aware of the fact that he had been aware of the fact that he had been aware of the fact that he had been aware of the fact that he had been aware of the fact that he had been aware of the fact that he had been aware of the fact that he had been aware of the fact that he had been aware of the fact that he had been aware of the fact that he had a relationship with the victim; (b) the nature of the crime and the criminal situation are extremely poor; and (c) the victim had suffered a big mental suffering other than property damage; (d) the damage was not completely recovered; (e) the victim had been aware of the fact that he had been aware of the fact that he had been aware of the fact that he had been aware of the fact that he had been aware of the fact

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.