A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

At around 02:20 on December 30, 2014, the Defendant received 112 reports from the D main points located in Youngdong-gu C and 3, Suwonnam Police Station E-gu, Suwonnam Police Station E-gu, Suwonnam Police Station, who called “Ahhh to know about it is necessary for police officers.” On the other hand, the Defendant tried to interfere with the above police officers’ performance of their duties by threateninging the Defendant to listen to the contents of the report. On the other hand, the Defendant’s body was pushed up two times at TV monitors located in that place, and the Defendant tried to interfere with the above police officers’ performance of their duties by threateninging the parts of the ness of the wind low-water disease, which is a dangerous object on which the police officers are boomed, with his hand, and attempted to interfere with the above police officers’ legitimate performance of their duties.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police statement concerning F;

1. G statements;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report on investigation (Attachment to photographs of sick persons threatening a suspect to visit a police officer);

1. Articles 144(1) and 136(1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting the crime;

1. In order to establish a legal order on the grounds of sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act and eradicate the light of public authority, the crime of obstruction of performance of official duties needs to be strictly punished.

However, it appears that the defendant has an opportunity to reflect on the defendant's family life through confinement, the punishment as ordered shall be determined in consideration of the defendant's age, character and conduct, family relationship, etc., including the fact that the defendant seems to have an opportunity to reflect on the defendant's family life at the time of the instant case, the fact that the defendant lost his ability and committed the crime