1. The part concerning the counterclaim in the judgment of the court of first instance shall be modified as follows.

Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant).

1. The reason why this court is stated in this part of the basic facts is the same as that of “1. Basic Facts” in the reasoning of the first instance judgment, except for the deletion of “ssssssssssssssssssss” in Part 4 of the fourth judgment of the first instance. As such, they are cited in accordance with the main sentence

2. The reasoning to be stated in this part of the judgment on the claim in this part is as follows: (a) it is identical to the part of “the judgment on the cause of the claim in this case” in the reasoning of the judgment in the first instance, except for the reason to be stated in this part as follows: (b) deleted Section 2, 5, 13, 5, 5, 5, 13, 5, 5, 100, 100, 100, 500, 500,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000

3. Determination on a counterclaim

A. Since there is no dispute between the parties that the Defendant rendered a judgment on the claim for the price of goods and the amount equivalent to KRW 12,402,39 pursuant to the instant contract for the supply of goods around August 2017, the Plaintiff is liable to pay the Defendant the price of goods and the delay damages therefrom.

B. The defendant's assertion 1) The defendant's argument that the plaintiff's unreasonable order caused losses to the plaintiff's inventory of 23,00 diskettes 23,00 won and damages caused by the plaintiff's unfair rejection of receipt. Thus, the plaintiff is obligated to pay the defendant damages equivalent to the above 's price of goods' (23,00 won equivalent to 621,00 won of 621,000 won of 621,000 won of 6,160 won of 6,702,080 won of 's price of raw materials produced at the plaintiff's request of 's 's 's 's 's 's 's '6,702,00 won of 's price of goods' and '11,750,000 won of 'the price of goods'.