logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2018.04.20 2017고단6870
폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(공동재물손괴등)등
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine for negligence of KRW 7,000,000, and by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

The Defendants respectively.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On August 25, 2017, at around 00:35, the Defendant, at around 00:35, the victim E from the “F,” which was operated by the victim E, who had been in the interest of “F”, said G, when he/she had a dispute with “F”, he/she was going to work, but the Defendant continued to engage in a dispute with B, and accompanied by the Defendant, as he/she had a talk with the said G, to the direction of a singing device monitor the glass balance and bottles on the table, etc. on which he/she had a talked with the said G, and as a result, he/she followed the table.

As a result, the Defendant, together with the above G (the same day summary indictment), damaged devices, such as the monitoring of singing singinginging machines owned by the victim, and their accessories and tables to constitute a total of KRW 1,925,000 for repair costs.

2. The Defendants committed the joint crime of the Defendants: (a) destroyed instruments, such as a singing device monitor at a entertainment shop, at the time and time under the preceding paragraph; and (b) the circumstances belonging to the H District of the Dong-dong Police Station, which was dispatched after receiving the report under the preceding paragraph, and confirmed the Defendants’ personal information to G, the said G refused to notify the said I of his personal information while performing a serious bath to the said I; and (c) arrested the said G as an offender in the crime of destroying property; (d) Defendant B was able to bring the said I’s arms to the said I; and (e) Defendant A was removed from the police rank of the said I with the left hand.

As a result, the Defendants conspired and interfered with the execution of official duties by assaulting police officers who are performing legitimate duties concerning the prevention, suppression, and investigation of crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant A's partial statement

1. Witness E;

1. Partial testimony of witness G;

1. Recording of a witness I's statement in the second public trial protocol;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. Each report on internal investigation:

1. On-site photographs;

1. Written estimate;

1. Investigation report- The application of the Acts and subordinate statutes attaching motion pictures to police officers sent to the scene;

1. Relevant Article of the Act and the choice of punishment for the crime;

A. Defendant A: Punishment of violence, etc.

arrow