The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The main point of the grounds for appeal is that the sentence imposed by the court below on the defendant (ten months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. The facts that each of the instant crimes committed by the Defendant, upon reporting by the victim, is disadvantageous to the Defendant, to the effect that the Defendant is subject to criminal punishment on several occasions due to intimidation to the investigation agency for the purpose of retaliation against retaliation against the Defendant’s being subjected to investigation by the said investigation agency, and to interfere with the victim’s multilateral business, and that the nature of the crime and method of committing the crime was very poor, and that the Defendant did not make any effort to recover from damage and did not reach agreement with the victim, and that the Defendant had a record of being subject to criminal punishment on several occasions due to the Defendant’s violation

On the other hand, all of the crimes of this case are recognized by the defendant and are against his mistake, the degree of injury suffered by the victim is relatively heavy, and the defendant seems to have committed each of the crimes of this case by contingency, etc. are favorable to the defendant.

위와 같은 사정들과 그 밖에 피고인의 나이, 성 행, 환경, 범행의 동기, 수단과 결과, 범행 후의 정황 등 변론에 나타난 모든 양형조건 및 대법원 양형 위원회 제정 양형기준의 권고 형량 범위 ◈ 법률상 처단형의 범위: 징역 6월 ~ 21년 ◈ 양형기준상 권고 형의 범위 기본범죄: 특정범죄 가중처벌 등에 관한 법률위반( 보복 협박 등) 죄 [ 유형의 결정] 폭력범죄 군 > 협박범죄 > 제 5 유형( 보복목적 협박) [ 권고 영역 및 권고 형의 범위] 기본영역, 징역 10월 ~ 2년 경합범죄 1: 업무 방해죄 [ 유형의 결정] 업무 방해범죄 군 > 업무 방해 [ 권고 영역 및 권고 형의 범위] 기본영역, 징역 6월 ~ 1년 6월 경합범죄 2: 상해죄 [ 유형의 결정] 폭력범죄 군 > 일반적인 상해 > 제 1 유형( 일반 상해) [ 권고 영역 및 권고 형의 범위] 기본영역, 징역 4월 ~ 1년 6월 다수범죄...