logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2015.01.29 2014고단1996
사기
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment of one year and two months, and Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of three thousand won,00,000 won.

Defendant

B The above fine.

Reasons

Criminal facts

The Defendants are people working together with victims E at the substitute driving office located in Seongbuk-gu, Sungnam-si, and the victim F is the victim E.

1. On May 201, Defendant A told the victim E to engage in a bond business, thereby borrowing money from the victim E, and thereafter repaying a part of the money borrowed from the victim E to the victims from around that time, Defendant A was engaged in the bond business in a manner that one’s own bonds were operated normally.

On December 2012, the Defendant committed a crime against the victim E with a false statement to the effect that “The Defendant would repay money without a mold because he/she has a place of bonds to the victim E,” at the above substitute driving office.

However, in fact, the Defendant was in bad credit standing at the time and was unable to recover the funds from the obligor, and thus, the Defendant was in a situation in which he borrowed money from the victim or the victim or the F with the money borrowed, and thus, there was no intention or ability to repay the money even if he borrowed money from the victim.

Nevertheless, on December 29, 2012, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, received 3,000,000 won from the victim to the stable account of husband G on December 29, 2012, and acquired 86,840,000 won in total over 19 times from around that time to April 13, 2013, as described in attached Table 1 (i).

B. (i) The Defendant would pay the victim F with a higher interest on the loan of the money at the victim F where his address is unknown at the time of the end of December 2012, 2012, where the Defendant’s address is not known, and the victim F will pay the victim F with a higher interest.

‘Falsely speaking to the effect that ‘’ was false.

However, in fact, the Defendant was in bad credit standing at the time and was unable to recover the funds from the obligor, and thus, the Defendant repaid the money borrowed from the victim or his/her Dong E with the money borrowed from the victim to his/her Dong E, so even if he/she borrowed money from the victim.

arrow