logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 2015.04.22 2014나4432
건물명도
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

Reasons

1. The reasons for the court's explanation concerning this case are as follows: "...." "the notice of termination of this case" shall be "(hereinafter "the notice of termination of this case")"; "358,00,000" shall be "358,80,000"; "2,000,000" shall be "2,220,000,000" shall be "2,000,000,000 other than 393,00,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 won" shall be "(393,000,000,000, 358,80,000, 2,000,000 won - - 2,000,000,000,000 won under the main sentence of the Civil Procedure Act" shall be 2,381,000,00000 won.

2. Forms 4, 16 and 7 of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be applied to the following parts:

B. The defendant's assertion 1) The defendant asserts that the necessary expenses related to the second floor waterproof construction of the building of this case (hereinafter "the claim of this case") and the parking lot ice construction, parking lot iron bars installation, parking lot approach and middle point approach, and beneficial expenses related to the construction for the first floor outer wall covering of the building of this case (hereinafter "the claim of this case") should be deducted from the rent or unjust enrichment equivalent to the rent that the defendant should pay to the plaintiff. The plaintiff asserts that the defendant has renounced his right to reimbursement of each of the above costs under the special agreement of this case.

In this regard, the defendant asserts that the waterproof Corporation is not subject to waiver of the right to demand reimbursement of necessary expenses because it falls under large-scale repairs.

B. Since the Defendant leased the instant building that is a general restaurant from the Plaintiff for the first time to the restaurant business, the Plaintiff’s explicit.

arrow