logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 부천지원 2016.05.13 2016고단761
재물손괴등
Text

The sentence of sentence against the defendant shall be suspended.

Of the facts charged of this case, the prosecution against assault is dismissed.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On February 8, 2016, the Defendant damaged the property by putting the victim C, a taxi engineer, at a level lower than the ordinary level of the taxi on the front side of the Seocho-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seoul, and then 23,574 won of the repair cost on the ground that the victim C, a taxi engineer, was at a level lower than the ordinary level of the taxi.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs of damaged parts;

1. Relevant Article 366 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. A fine of 700,000 won to be suspended;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act (Conversion of KRW 100,000 per day) to the custody of a workhouse;

1. The part dismissing the prosecution under Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act (the defendant reflects his mistake, the defendant's primary crime that has no record of criminal punishment, the defendant's agreement with the victim C that the damaged person does not want the punishment of the defendant, and other factors considered for sentencing) of the suspended sentence

1. Around February 8, 2016, the Defendant: (a) 20:20 on the roads of Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seoul; (b) Doncheon-gu; (c) Doncheon-gu; and (d) Doncheon-gu, Seocheon-gu; (c) Doncheon-gu; (d) Doncheon-gu; and (d) Doncheon-gu; and (d) Doncheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu; and (d) Dondong-gu, Doncheon

2. Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts charged of judgment: A judgment dismissing a public prosecution on the ground that a written agreement stating that the victim C of Article 260(3) of the Criminal Act does not want the punishment of the defendant on March 7, 2016 after the prosecution is submitted (Article 327 subparag. 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act).

arrow