All appeals filed by the defendant and prosecutor are dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal asserts that the defendant's punishment (two months of imprisonment with prison labor for the first crime, and six months of imprisonment with prison labor for the second and fifth crimes) declared by the court below is too unreasonable, and that the prosecutor is too unfeasible and unfair.

2. It is recognized that the defendant led to confession and reflects on the facts charged.

On the other hand, the fact that the defendant has been punished several times for the same crime, and the defendant is also recognized as having caused a serious obstacle to the investigation of the crime of the investigative agency by forging another person's signature when he/she is discovered by a drinking free license without permission by an investigative agency.

In full view of the aforementioned circumstances, comprehensively taking into account the following circumstances, the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, occupation, details and details leading to the instant crime, and circumstances leading to the instant crime, etc., the sentence imposed by the lower court is deemed appropriate, and it does not seem that the sentence imposed by the Defendant is too minor or unreasonable.

Therefore, the above argument by the defendant and the prosecutor is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the appeal filed by the defendant and the prosecutor is groundless, and all of them are dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.