logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2016.10.06 2016고단4766
공무집행방해
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

At around 00:20 on June 10, 2016, the Defendant: (a) sent to Dong-gu, Incheon; (b) during the course of the Defendant’s use of a slope E and policeman, who was sent by the Defendant after having received a report that the Defendant scambling, took a bath at the front of the road; and (c) notified the Defendant that the Defendant could be punished for light crimes, the Defendant was able to ask for personal information; (d) “I am to ask for personal information; and (e) I am to the Defendant’s chest using the Taekwondo belt he was in possession of the Defendant; and (e) during the course of the use of the Defendant’s scambling, f’s face and chest; and (e) during the course of the use of the Defendant’s scambling at the front of the road; and (e) during the use of the Defendant’s scambling, the Defendant was able to scam off the Defendant’s clothes when she was out.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers in relation to the prevention, suppression and investigation of crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement of E and F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to criminal investigation reports, photographs of damage, investigation reports (report on the attachment and analysis of motion pictures taken by police officers), criminal history records, etc. inquiry reports, and criminal investigation reports (Attachment to a written decision on non-prosecution of a suspect-related case);

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts, Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act of the choice of a sentence, the choice of a fine (the police officer who first called for the party was trying to notify the defendant of violation of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act due to disturbance of alcohol, the suspension of indictment for the defendant in 2015 has no record of any other crime, and the degree of the assault in this case is not more severe, and the defendant is receiving a mental treatment for the defendant as the lebrue, lebium, and the lebre support group for alcohol dependence, etc.)

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;

arrow