A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

The request for the treatment and custody of this case is dismissed.

Punishment of the crime

[criminal history] On November 17, 2011, the Defendant was sentenced to three years of imprisonment for a violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (Habitual Injury) at the Cheongju District Court (hereinafter “Cheongju District Court”) and completed the execution of the sentence at the Cheongju Prison on May 7, 2014.

[Criminal facts]

1. On June 1, 2014, the Defendant interfered with the business of the Defendant: (a) obstructed the victim’s restaurant business by force, such as the victim F, in the “G” restaurant operated by the victim F, who was in the Chungcheongbuk-gun E on the day of June 2014; (b) under the influence of alcohol, the Defendant fing the disturbance, such as her friencing and drinking, and passing through drinking, while under the influence of alcohol. In addition, the Defendant interfered with the victim’s restaurant business by force during 22 times from around that time to June 8, 2015, such as her friencing with a large sound, such as the list of crimes in the attached Form.

2. On July 25, 2015, the Defendant: (a) around 17:30, at the I restaurant located on the 1st floor H of the Chungcheongnamcheon-gun, Chungcheongnamcheon-do; (b) on the ground that the victim J (47 years of age) who is under other food in the process of drinking alcohol gets the Defendant, the Defendant saw beer who is a dangerous thing on the table of the victim; and (c) took one time at the victim’s face face, the Defendant saw the victim as an internal body in need of approximately two weeks of treatment.

3. On July 26, 2015, the Defendant: (a) around the L cafeteria located in the Chungcheongnamcheon-gun, Chungcheongnamcheon-gun, Chungcheongnam-do; (b) on the ground that the Defendant changed the Defendant, the Defendant expressed the victim’s Ma (46 years old); (c) on the ground that “the victim’s Ma (46 years old) was fluencing the victim’s humb, why she was flued, and that she was unable to identify the number of days of treatment because the victim’s flucing part of the victim’s chest was pushed down by the victim’s head due to the shoulder dust on the floor, etc. on which she was unable to identify the number of days of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

[Judgment No. 1]

1. Statement of the defendant in the first trial record;

1. Police statements made to F, N,O, P, and Q;

1. Copies of books of account (F), copies of places of business (O);

1. 112 Report for handling of reported cases (the fact No. 2 of the judgment);

1. Statement of the defendant in the first trial record;

1. Statement of the police statement to J 1.