logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2020.12.09 2020고단6468
공무집행방해등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

At around 00:40 on June 27, 2020, the Defendant: (a) received 112 reports to “C” in front of the Seo-gu Incheon, Seo-gu, Incheon; (b) 2 patrol teams belonging to the Incheon Western Police Station D District Police Station D District Team E, who called to the site, sent to F in the course of questioning of the facts of damage and the facts of damage from E; and (c) she was blicked from the above patrol officer E in the course of questioning to verify the facts of damage; (d) the Defendant blicked the above patrol officer’s right side part of E one time on drinking to the right side part of the above patrol officer, and

As a result, the defendant assaulted the above police officer and interfered with his legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of the 112 reported case.

Summary of Evidence

1. The police statement of the defendant E in his court statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the F Statements;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of fines, and the choice of fines;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order is not sufficient in light of the developments and attitudes of the police officers who received 112 reports in relation to F and dispatched the police officers after receiving 112 reports in relation to F.

However, in light of the fact that the Defendant recognized the instant crime and reflected against the Defendant, the police officer E also wanting to leave the Defendant’s seat, and the Defendant, except for the instant crime, takes into account the fact that there is no other criminal record, and comprehensively takes into account various sentencing conditions in the instant case, such as the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, family relationship, and circumstances after the instant crime, the sentence is determined as ordered.

Public Prosecution Rejection Parts

1. The summary of the facts charged is that the defendant is starting from G-si operated by the victim F, who stopped in front of the "C" on June 27, 2020, as indicated in the judgment at around 00:40.

The part of the victim's timber 2 times as drinking, and assaulted the victim by continuously drinking the left part 3 times as drinking and pushing it.

2. The facts charged in this part of the judgment are crimes falling under Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act, and are the same Act.

arrow