logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2015.04.23 2015나26
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

Reasons

1. The plaintiff is the owner of the Guro-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government B apartment No. 4 and No. 301 (hereinafter "the apartment of this case"). On August 2012, 201, the apartment of this case began to have water leakages in the inside bank of the apartment of this case. The above water leakages due to defects in common areas, such as the outer wall of the apartment of this case where the defendant is responsible for management, and the defendant neglected to report water leakages of the apartment of this case and expanded the damages. Thus, the defendant asserts that he is liable to compensate the plaintiff for damages of KRW 3,90,00 under the name of the plaintiff, such as inside construction cost and consolation money. However, although it is insufficient to recognize that the water leakages of the apartment of this case claimed by the plaintiff were caused by defects in common areas such as outer wall, etc., the plaintiff's assertion based on this premise is not sufficient to further examine.

2. If so, the plaintiff's claim of this case is dismissed as it is without merit, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow