logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2016.01.20 2014고단6356 (1)
사기등
Text

The Defendants are not guilty. The summary of the judgment is publicly announced.

Reasons

Defendant A of the instant charges against the Defendants, “2014 Highest 6356, 6356,” is a person who is an operator of H’s “H” (hereinafter “H”) located in the United States, and Defendant B is a person who is the head of HUA.

1. The Defendants were in Sinwon-si I on November 15, 2013.

H The injured party J is the H's Korean branch office in the United States.

H sells global famous mers in various countries including the United States, China, etc., and thereby raises a lot of profits.

If investment is made as a member and 1.45 million won is paid for each code, AD is granted, and two subordinate members are recommended, 1.80,000 won will be paid as allowances.

In addition, when five subordinate members are recruited and registered, entry into the global room can be made, and when three to four months are entered the global room, 2.3 million won will be paid, even if they do not engage in any business activity, the subordinate members automatically are recruited, and the two times the allowances already paid are paid according to certain intervals, such as three to four months, etc.

“ ................”

However, in fact, the Defendants did not have any particular property, and the profits from the shopping mall business conducted at H were rarely not generated, and as a result, it is inevitable to take the method of paying profits to the existing investors in consecutive order with investments made by the next-order investors. As long as a new investor is not retained, the Defendants did not have the intent or ability to pay profits exceeding the principal of the investment even if they received investments from the victims because of extremely weak monetary basis, such as the likelihood of being unable to pay or redeem profits exceeding the principal of the investment, so long as a new investor is not retained.

The Defendants conspired to induce the victim, thereby deceiving the victim, and thereby deceiving him.

arrow