1. The portion of the real estate listed in the separate sheet No. 1, among the real estate listed in the separate sheet No. 1, and each real estate listed in the separate sheet No. 2 and No. 3.

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff A’s book consists of K 34 large descendants as a joint set of K 34 large descendants for the purpose of preserving and managing the graves of their descendants, their mutual cooperation, friendship, etc.

B. On June 23, 1965, with respect to 1/3 shares of the instant 1/3 shares, the registration of transfer of ownership based on the sale on August 9, 1950 in the name of the deceased M (Death on October 4, 200), N, andO respectively, was completed on June 23, 1965 in the name of the deceased M on June 28, 1965, and with respect to the instant 2 and 3 real estate, the registration of transfer of ownership based on the sale on July 6, 1940, respectively.

C. The Defendants are the successors of the network M. D.

Plaintiff

On July 6, 2009, in the name of PPP, Gwangju District Court 2009Kadan44162, which filed a lawsuit against the Defendants on June 28, 201 for the registration of transfer of ownership on the ground of the cancellation of title trust with respect to the shares of 1/3 among the instant real estate No. 1, and the instant 2 and 3 real estate, and was sentenced to a favorable judgment on June 28, 201, but was sentenced to a favorable judgment on March 28, 2012 on the ground that “Pm cannot be deemed to constitute a clan of unique meaning, and thus, it cannot be deemed to constitute a clan of its own meaning.”

E. Thereafter, on October 16, 2012, Plaintiff A filed a lawsuit against the Defendants on October 16, 2012 against Gwangju District Court 2012Kadan57236, and was sentenced to a favorable judgment on October 17, 2013, on the ground that “O was appointed as the representative of Plaintiff A” in the case of the Seoul District Court 2013Na12101, which is the appellate court’s appellate court on July 11, 2014, the Plaintiff was sentenced to a judgment of retirement on September 1, 2012, on the ground that the convening procedure is grave defect, and theO is not authorized to file the instant lawsuit on behalf of Plaintiff A, while the Plaintiff was not authorized to file the instant lawsuit on behalf of Plaintiff A.”

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 10 (including paper numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply), the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The primary claim;