The defendant shall be sentenced to two months of imprisonment with prison labor and four months of imprisonment with prison labor for the crime No. 2-A, b.

Punishment of the crime

On September 4, 2008, the Defendant was sentenced to one year of suspension of execution on the 11st of the same month, which was sentenced to one year of imprisonment for fraud, etc. at the Incheon District Court Branch Branch, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on the 2nd of the same month. On November 29, 201, the Defendant was sentenced to two years of suspension of execution on the 6th of imprisonment for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (unlicensed Driving) at the Jungyang Branch Branch of the Suwon District Court, which became final and conclusive on December 7, 2011. On June 14, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced to four months of imprisonment for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (Unlicensed Driving) at the Pyeongtaek Branch of the Suwon District Court, and was dismissed by the Supreme Court on February 19, 2014.

1. Around August 19, 2008, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that “A victim N who was aware of the fact that he/she would have repaid the amount to be used individually and promptly within one month, if he/she lent five million won as he/she needs to be repaid.”

However, the Defendant did not have any particular income or property at the time and did not have any intent or ability to repay the said money even if the Defendant borrowed the said money from the victim, such as the prospects and profitability of the progress of the construction work, etc.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, received KRW 5 million from the victim to the account of community credit cooperatives (Account Number: G) in his/her name on the same day.

2. Crimes againstR;

A. On October 2, 2011, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that “The Defendant would make a settlement after the end of 7.1 million won as the part of part of part of part of part of part of part of purchase in land is required,” to the victim R, who was introduced through S, which was known to the Defendant, through L, that he would purchase 600 square meters on the land located in the city of Gyeonggi-si, and would purchase 600 square meters on the land located in the city of Gyeonggi-si.”

However, the defendant did not have any income or property at the time, and the site of the above T-owned house construction is due to the failure of the original contractor (U Construction).