1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. Summary of the parties' arguments;

A. The Plaintiff asserted that the Plaintiff lent KRW 15 million to the Defendant on December 10, 2015, and KRW 15 million on January 12, 2016, and thus, the Defendant shall return to the Plaintiff.

B. The 15 million won that the Plaintiff transferred to the Defendant by the Defendant’s assertion is merely the down payment that the Plaintiff concluded and paid with E with respect to the macro-si apartment D through the Defendant.

2. According to the statement in Gap evidence No. 1, the plaintiff may recognize the fact that he/she remitted the sum of KRW 10 million to the No. 10,000,000,000 to the No. 12,000,000 won to the No. 12,000,000,000 won to the No. 12,00,000,000 won to the No. 12,000,000,000 won to the No. 12,000,000,000,000 won to the No. 12,000,000,000 won to the No. 12,000,000,000 won to the No. 12,000,000,000,000 won to the No. 22,000,00,000,00 won to the defendant.

Therefore, the plaintiff's assertion is without merit.

3. Conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case shall be dismissed as it is without merit.

The judgment of the first instance is just in conclusion, and thus, the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.