1. The plaintiff C and D's claims are all dismissed.

2. The costs of the lawsuit shall be borne by the plaintiff C and D.

1. On January 7, 1974, A reported marriage with G and the divorce on May 24, 1979.

After that, H and A reported marriage on March 31, 1984.

A had Plaintiff B between G and H, and had Plaintiff C and D between H.

The defendant is a person born between H and H, the former husband of H.

Attached Form

On November 14, 2005, the registration of ownership transfer was completed on the apartment recorded in the list (hereinafter referred to as the “instant apartment”) due to the sale on the same day in H on the same day.

H died on February 24, 2008.

A died on January 9, 2016 after the filing date of the instant lawsuit.

On January 27, 2016, the F attorney of the deceased A applied for the continuation of the instant legal proceedings on behalf of the plaintiffs, who are the successors of the deceased.

Plaintiff

B On April 4, 2016, the District Court 2016Ra673 decided on the renunciation of inherited property, and the above court ordered the acceptance of the above report on July 19, 2016.

The plaintiffs' attorney modified the purport of the claim to transfer the 2/18 shares of the apartment of this case to the plaintiffs C and D by reflecting the waiver of the above inheritance by the plaintiffs B.

[Reasons for Recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap 1-3 evidence, 6, 7 evidence, 20-12 evidence, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The gist of the Plaintiff C and D’s assertion is that the Plaintiff C and D’s apartment building was purchased from J by lending the name of H, and that it was a property trusted in trust in the H.

The purchase price of the apartment of this case is KRW 85,00,000, which is KRW 50,000,000 (=the balance of KRW 10,000,000 and KRW 40,000,00,000, which is the remainder of the above purchase price, except for bank loans (=the balance of KRW 10,000,000) from the above purchase price of the apartment of this case, was appropriated as KRW 94,316,70,00,

The deceased Gap terminated the title trust agreement to the defendant who succeeded to the status of trustee from H with respect to the 2/9 portion of the apartment of this case by the service of the duplicate of the complaint of this case.