beta
Text
Defendant
Among the facts charged against A and B, each of the offering of a bribe and the tax invoice in excess of attached Form 2(T).
Reasons
The non-guilty part [the offering of bribe] - Defendant A and Defendant B]
1. The summary of the facts charged is Defendant B as the school operation team leader of H (hereinafter “H”) from July 2006 to December 2007. From December 2, 2007, Defendant B works as the school operation team leader of the school operation headquarters of H (hereinafter “State”) and from around December 2007, as the head of the school education headquarters, in entering into a contract related to the after-school project of the private school, such as the dissemination/operation of computer units, work related to the construction of computer classes, students, and instructors management. Defendant A is a person in charge of the affairs related to the after-school project of H from July 2006 to December 207, the school operation team leader of the school education headquarters of H from July 2006 to December 2, 207, and the person in charge of the affairs related to the conclusion of contracts related to the after-school project of the private school, the affairs related to the provision/operation of computer classes and the management of after-school classes.
Defendant
B. The (State) H School Center under the jurisdiction of Defendant A intends to pay money and valuables to the principals who exercise strong influence in the selection of enterprises in order to conclude contracts with the national elementary schools in relation to the dissemination and operation of a private school computer for elementary school participating in the government since 1997. Since 2006, the public corporations such as T (hereinafter “T”) and U (hereinafter “U”) have issued a tax invoice at an excessive amount of money when claiming construction cost by excessively appropriating the construction cost, and then have them issued the tax invoice at an excessive amount of money. The excessive amount of construction cost paid to the above corporations has been raised by receiving return from the heads of the local branches in charge of the business of the computer classroom and using it as the street funds for the principals, etc.
Defendant
B shall be appointed as the head of the school operation team on July 2006 and the work price shall be paid.