logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
arrow
광주지방법원 해남지원 2016.09.08 2016고정40
위증
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

C received a partial winning judgment in a lawsuit for refund of the purchase price in the above court 2012 Gohap1739, which was filed against D in Changwon District Court branch on August 16, 2012, and received a judgment dismissing the appeal regarding the above court 2013Na3241 in the Busan High Court on July 9, 2015 after the appeal, and received a judgment dismissing the appeal on the above court 2013Na3241 on December 15, 2015 from the Supreme Court on December 15, 2015 after the appeal.

On April 24, 2012, the Defendant: (a) sent a phone call to C and asked D to prepare and deliver a confirmation letter that D does not have any long-term lease by phone call to the Defendant; and (b) “D has no credibility despite D’s phone call and confirmation letter; (c) “D has no long-term lease for 10 years”; and (d) “D’s confirmation letter that it had no long-term lease for 10 years, need to be sent back to the district; and (d) “I have tried to do so in writing.” (e) “I will not have to make legal statements.” (e.g., whether I have made legal statements.” (e., “I will have to keep up for a long-term lease for 10 years.” (e.g., a confirmation letter that D had no long-term lease for 10 years).

Nevertheless, at around 16:00 on June 12, 2014, the Defendant appeared as a witness at the date of pleading of the judgment on the claim for the purchase price return of the Plaintiff (Appellant) and the Defendant (Appellant) D's Busan High Court (original District Court) 2013Na3241, which is located in Changwon-gu, Changwon-si, Changwon-si, Changwon-si, Busan, and issued a witness oath upon receiving a warning of perjury. On April 24, 2012, the Defendant called the Plaintiff C first to call the Plaintiff on the day of pleading for the preparation of a confirmation document that he did not conclude a long-term lease contract, unlike the facts, and consulted the Plaintiff (C).

arrow