logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전고등법원 2020.08.13 2020누10089
벌점부과처분취소
Text

1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the plaintiffs falling under the revocation of the following disposition is revoked.

The defendant on 2018.

Reasons

1. The grounds for this part of the disposition are as stated in the corresponding part of the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance, except for a partial revision as follows. Thus, this part of the reasoning is cited in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

The second place shall add “(the apartment of this case is 704 households)” to the end of the fourth place.

Article 21-4 of the former Construction Technology Management Act (amended by Act No. 11056, Sep. 16, 2011; hereinafter the same) provides for the following: (a) although Article 53 of the former Construction Technology Management Act (amended by Act No. 11056, Sep. 16, 2011; hereinafter the same shall apply), the prior notice states that Article 21-4 of the former Construction Technology Management Act is based on the Act and subordinate statutes. The former Construction Technology Promotion Act was wholly amended by Act No. 11794, May 22, 2013; (b) its Addenda (amended by Act No. 11794, May 22, 2013; hereinafter the same shall apply); and (c) Article 24 of the former Enforcement Rule of the Construction Technology Management Act (amended by Act No. 11068, Aug. 21, 2011; hereinafter the same shall apply) provides that administrative dispositions against the acts prior to the enforcement of the instant apartment.

On the last page of the second place, the following shall be added:

A person shall be appointed.

D. The violation of the disposition 3, which is indicated in the prior notice of the instant disposition (Evidence A 2), is "the construction with a height of partial lamps for access to the underground parking lot (not less than 2.5m in the traffic impact assessment, not less than 2.5m in the executory 2.3m)" and "the effective width is less than 7.5m in the slope way different from the traffic impact assessment," and is related to the

arrow