The defendant is innocent.

1. On July 2012, the Defendant, in the facts charged, damaged the reputation of the victim by openly pointing out false facts by phone call to the Defendant’s husband E and the victim F, who is the husband of the Defendant’s pro-Japanese G in the art industry, despite the fact that the Defendant’s husband E and the victim F are not in a internal relationship.

2. According to the judgment witness H’s legal statement, etc., the Defendant was suspected of having internal relations between husband E and victim F. On July 2012, 2012, the Defendant called “E” and “H with the same Art Research Institute” and “H,” and “H, with the intention to verify the facts, called “E” and “E” and “E” and “E” and “E” and “E” and “E” from “E” and “E” and “h, with the wind that the Defendant would have well known the phone contents to a third party.” As such, the instant facts charged cannot be recognized in light of the following: (a) the Defendant did not inform the third party of the relationship between E and H; and (b) the Defendant did not notify the phone contents to a third party, and thus, the Defendant cannot be found guilty of the crime of defamation.