The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
1. The sentence imposed by the court below (six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.
2. The judgment of the Defendant reflects the mistake while making a confession of the instant crime, and the fact that the Defendant agreed with the victims of the larceny crime, etc. are considered favorable to the Defendant.
However, the instant crime committed by the Defendant, along with D, steals scrap metal on the apartment rooftop where the Defendant works as security guards, and driving of freight cars without a driver’s license, with heavy nature of the crime, and the Defendant committed the instant crime at once during the period of repeated crime due to the crime of larceny and unlicensed driving, etc., in consideration of the fact that the Defendant committed the instant crime during the period of repeated crime due to the crime of larceny and unlicensed driving, etc., the punishment imposed by the lower court is the only sentence, and all other sentencing conditions shown in the instant argument, such as the Defendant’s age, sexual behavior, home environment, etc., it is not recognized that the sentence imposed by the lower court is too unreasonable.
Therefore, the defendant's assertion is not accepted.
3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.