logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
arrow
청주지방법원 2016.12.22 2015구합12057
손실보상금
Text

1. The Defendant: (a) from May 16, 2015 to May 16, 2015 to Plaintiff A; and (b) from Plaintiff B, to Plaintiff B’s KRW 115,070,280.

Reasons

1. Details, etc. of ruling;

(a) Business name - Business name: D General Industrial Complex development project (hereinafter referred to as “instant project”): Defendant - Public notice given on August 8, 2008, E publicly notified on July 31, 2009; G public notice given on February 3, 2012; H public notice given on March 21, 2014; and I notice given on May 23, 2014

(b) The adjudication of expropriation by the local Land Tribunal of Chungcheongbuk-do on August 19, 2014 and March 17, 2015 - Persons subject to expropriation: The same shall apply to the land specified in the attached Form of Compensation.

(A) Among them, each land owned by the Plaintiff A is referred to as “A” and the land owned by the Plaintiff B is referred to as “B” and collectively referred to as “each land of this case” - Compensation: The amount indicated in the column for “land subject to expropriation” in the attached compensation list, which is the arithmetic average of the appraisal results of Sam Chang Chang Corporation Corporation as to the land A, one appraisal corporation as to the land, and each appraisal result of one appraisal corporation as to the land B, and each appraisal result of the national appraisal corporation as to the land (hereinafter collectively referred to as “appraisal of expropriation”): The amount indicated in the attached compensation list, which is the arithmetic average of each appraisal result of each appraisal by the appraisal corporation as to the land B, and the national appraisal corporation as to the land ( collectively referred to as “appraisal of expropriation”): The land in B (special-purpose area: a natural green area: a green area of 3,68 square meters, a preserved green area of 416 square meters): The date of expropriation, as

C. The Central Land Tribunal made an objection on October 22, 2015 (hereinafter “Objection”) - The content of the Decision: The amount indicated in the “Objection” column in the attached Table in the attached Table shall be determined as compensation, based on the arithmetic average of the appraisal results of the appraisal corporation, the Korea Appraisal Board, the Korea Appraisal Board, and each appraisal result of the Central Appraisal Board with respect to the land A (hereinafter collectively referred to as “Objection”) as to the land B, and the amount indicated in the attached Table in the compensation specification in the attached Table, based on the arithmetic average of the appraisal results of each appraisal result of the appraisal results of the Korea Appraisal Board, the Korea Appraisal Board, the Korea Appraisal Board, and the Korea Appraisal Board, the Korea Appraisal Board (hereinafter collectively referred to as “Objection Appraisal Board”): The status of the use of the land B: The 1,590 square meters out of the natural green belt part has

arrow