logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 고양지원 2016.06.24 2016고단1387
상해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On May 24, 2016, the Defendant damaged the said vehicle to the extent of KRW 466,288 repair cost, as the Defendant was able to take a walk on the cafeteria, which is located in Gyeyang-gu, Seoyang-gu, Seoul, in order to board customers on the roads adjacent to the “D” restaurant. The Defendant was able to take a walk on the victim F-si, who is equipped with Ebasi-gu cab with the Ebasi cab and walked the knife, and walked the knife of the knife by walking the knife of the knife.

2. At the time and place described in paragraph 1, the injured Defendant confirmed the fact of damage and got a stop from the victim F (46 tax) who resisted the damage, and caused the injury to the victim by putting the bottom of the victim’s left face face one time by drinking and hand, making the victim’s face, hair, body boom, etc. several times by drinking and hand, and by putting the victim’s back by hand, resulting in an injury to the victim, such as the b1-day click, play, etc. which requires treatment.

3. On May 24, 2016, the Defendant: (a) was arrested as a current offender, such as property damage, etc. by a private person H, who was dispatched after receiving a report on the above criminal facts on May 24, 2016; and (b) was subject to an investigation within the G belt of the Goyang-gu Goyang-gu Godong Police Station G District of the Goyangyang Police Station, Gyeyang-gu I.

At around 02:30 on the same day, the Defendant, within the G District Zone of the Goyang Police Station at the Goyangyang Police Station at around 02:30 on the same day, had the back head of the above H one that he was seated and moved to the seat of the Defendant, and obstructed police officers from performing their legitimate duties regarding the investigation of police officers

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made with H and F;

1. A written diagnosis of injury and written estimate;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to each photograph (Evidence No. 1 and 5);

1. Relevant Article 366 of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, Article 366 of the Criminal Act, Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of injury), Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstructing the performance of official duties), and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor, respectively;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act:

arrow