All appeals filed by the prosecutor against the Defendants are dismissed.

1. In full view of the evidence submitted by the prosecutor, the court below erred by misapprehending the facts or by misapprehending the legal principles, which affected the conclusion of the judgment, although the defendants could sufficiently recognize the fact that the defendants violated the honor of L/F by pointing out specific false facts, and thereby, did not prove each of the facts charged in this case against the defendants.

2. Determination

A. From 2000 to 200, Defendant B’s summary of the facts charged in this case against the Defendants: (a) the driver of the vehicle for the collection of excreta belonging to G limited company G, which is operated by the victim F, which is a purification tank 208 officetel 208, and (b) the Defendant C was the driver of the said G, the Defendant A was the operator of the vehicle for the collection of excreta; (c) the Plaintiff was the operator of the I affiliated company of the K M&K Association, which is the manager of the H located in the Changwon M&M-si, and (d) the victim’s G and the victim’s operation of the victim F-based limited company were jointly used the OM at the Changwon-si, Changwon-si N&M

1) Defendant A had not committed any unlawful act in the OM operated by the victim L and the victim F limited liability company G in Changwon-si NM in Changwon-si, Changwon-si, Masan-si, on October 201, Defendant A damaged the reputation of the victims by openly pointing out false information on the entrance and the wall of the above garage by attaching a banner stating “the government compensation total” on the board and the wall of the above garage, “the injured party shall be paid to the malicious business owner,” “the injured party shall be removed from the agency, the injured party shall be the sturg, and the sturg shall be the sturg in the sturg.” (2) Defendant C, B, and B conspired, around December 26, 2011, with the victim’s staff’s benefits and bonuses, etc., on the front side of the P vehicle belonging to G, even though the Defendants operated by the victim F in the NM in Changwon-si NM-gu, Changwon-si.