Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, as to the defendants, the above two-year period from the date of this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A, as the Republic of Korea origin in Bangladesh, is a person who has obtained the nationality of the Republic of Korea around November 16, 2010 with Korean and international marriage, and Defendant B began with the above teaching system from January 2015 to around August 17, 2015.

On January 1, 2015, the Defendants received a fee, which cannot be known from Doman-si, Doman-si, in a place where it is not known to the early police officer, and provided counseling for recognition of refugee status, and Defendant A prepared a written panmanial spirit hearing of the above person.

From around that time to November 2015, the Defendants conspired to engage in the business of a licensed administrative agent without the qualification of the licensed administrative agent by receiving fees that cannot be known from the 20ths of Bangladesh, such as the list of crimes in the annexed list of crimes, and preparing an application for recognition of refugee status.

Summary of Evidence

1. The legal statement of Defendant A and some of Defendant B’s legal statement

1. Legal statement of E;

1. Statement made by the prosecution against E;

1. Each protocol concerning the examination of a police officer against F, G, H, I, J, K, L, M, or N;

1. Each police statement made againstO or P;

1. Table of the hearing of the people's mind, the record of foreigner registration, or the certificate for accommodation/resident/resident/resident/resident/resident/resident/resident/resident/resident/resident's service (Evidence Nos. 8 through 20, 26 through 35, 43, 45, 47, 48, 51, 54, 66, 69, 71, 73, 76, 76 through 79, 83, 86 through 88, 92, 93, 95, 96, 127 through 136, 141, 142);

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to a criminal investigation report (to specify the suspect's personal information as to the suspect);

1. Article 36(1)1, Article 3(1)1, and Article 2(1)1 and 6 of the Administrative Judicial Act concerning facts constituting an offense; Article 36(1)1, and Article 2(1)6 of the Criminal Act; Article 30 of the Criminal Act; each choice of imprisonment with labor;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act for the suspension of execution;

1. Defendant A: The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2(1) and the main sentence of Article 62-2(2) of the Criminal Act is to prevent the Defendants from committing the instant crime continuously and repeatedly for the purpose of acquiring economic benefits without the qualification of the administrative agency, thereby making it difficult to manage the entry and departure and sojourn of foreigners.