logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 2016.06.22 2016고정167
수질및수생태계보전에관한법률위반
Text

Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

Defendant

If A does not pay the above fine, it shall be 100.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Co., Ltd.”) is a corporation established for the purpose of manufacturing synthetic resin products. Defendant A is the representative director of Defendant Co., Ltd.

1. On November 30, 2015, Defendant A, at the place of business of a stock company located in Kimhae-si D, Defendant A, using four water cooling cooling equipment in 0.168 cubic meters of 0.168 cubic meters (hereinafter “instant cooling equipment”), a discharge facility installed without obtaining permission from the competent administrative authority, carried out the manufacturing operation of the PVC facility.

2. A, the representative of the defendant defendant of the defendant company, used the facility installed without obtaining permission for the defendant's business as described in paragraph 1, and the defendant committed a violation.

Summary of Evidence

1. The Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Legal statement of witness E;

1. Determination as to the assertion by the accused, the written accusation, the written confirmation, the Defendants on-site photographs, and the defense counsel

1. The summary of the claim is that the Defendants used only two air conditioners of this case, and in such a case, the volume of the discharge facilities is less than 0.1 cubic meters, and thus, the competent authority’s permission is not required for not falling under wastewater discharge facilities.

2. The following facts acknowledged by the evidence of the judgment are as follows: ① at the time of detection by the public official E, all of the four air conditioners of this case at the time of detection by the public official in charge, and there was no particular difference in appearance between the two air conditioners of this case used for the air conditioners of this case and the two air conditioners of this case used for the Defendant not to be used by the Defendant; ② the Defendant A prepared a written confirmation confirming that the air conditioners of this case are being used for four air conditioners at the time of detection of the violation of this case; ③ the Defendant A signed this; ③ the Defendant A completely removed two air conditioners of this case after detection, the Defendants used all four air conditioners of this case at the time of detection.

It is reasonable to view that the Defendants and their defense counsel are not acceptable.

Application of Statutes

1...

arrow