logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2019.06.04 2018누76110
실업급여 지급제한 등 처분 취소청구의 소
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited by the plaintiff at the court of first instance is not significantly different from that of the court of first instance, and even if the evidence submitted at the court of first instance is re-examined, the judgment of the court of first instance that rejected the plaintiff'

Therefore, the court's explanation on this case is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, in addition to the dismissal of part of the judgment of the court of first instance as follows. Thus, it is acceptable to accept this as it is in accordance with Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 420 of the

C. Foods

A. The second half of the 5th page “Around that time” is considered as “at the request of the Plaintiff on May 1, 2015.”

B. On May 1, 2015, the first unemployment recognition date, the Plaintiff appeared at the Seoul Southern Employment Center operated by the Defendant on May 1, 2015. Accordingly, on May 29 and 26, 2015, the second unemployment recognition date, the second unemployment recognition date, the third unemployment recognition date, the third unemployment recognition date, the Internet was applied for the recognition of unemployment. On July 24, 2015, the fourth unemployment recognition date, the Seoul Southern Employment Center was present at the Seoul Southern Employment Center on July 24, 2015, and the new unemployment recognition was applied for the recognition of unemployment after the change of the type of the unemployment recognition to the appearance.

(c)for the last 9 through 10 pages 3:

"(4) In the event that the head of an employment security office finds out the intention of receiving job-seeking benefits while paying job-seeking benefits, trust in social assistance has been impaired, thereby suspending the payment of remaining job-seeking benefits after the attempt to receive job-seeking benefits. It accords with equity to take measures to recover all job-seeking benefits after receiving job-seeking benefits after receiving all the job-seeking benefits.

In this regard, the main sentence of Article 61 (1) of the Act is stipulated.

arrow