beta
Text
1. The Defendant shall deliver to the Plaintiff the real estate indicated in the attached list, and the said real estate from February 5, 2017.
Reasons
1. Indication of claim;
A. On January 9, 2016, the Plaintiff agreed to the Defendant to pay the lease deposit amount of KRW 30 million, monthly rent of KRW 1.7 million, and the lease amount of KRW 1.7 million from February 1, 2016 to January 31, 2017 (12 months) (On the other hand, the Plaintiff and the Defendant agreed to pay the lease deposit amount of KRW 20 million from March 2016 to KRW 1.8 million from January 31, 2017.
(2) However, the Defendant paid KRW 20 million out of the lease deposit to the Plaintiff, and paid KRW 1.7 million on February 2, 2016, and did not pay rent from March 3, 2016 to the day. (2) The Plaintiff notified the Defendant of the termination of the instant lease by mail verifying the contents of the relevant lease contract on September 30, 2016, and the instant lease contract was lawfully terminated. Even if not, the instant lease contract was lawfully terminated by the delivery of a copy of the complaint of the instant case.
3) Therefore, the lease deposit amount of KRW 20 million was deducted from the amount equal to the amount of KRW 1,980,000 (=180,000 won x 11 month) that is equivalent to the rent or the rent from March 1, 2016 to January 31, 2017. The remainder of KRW 200,000 was deducted from the amount equal to the unjust enrichment of KRW 240,00 (=1.80,000 won x 30 days) that is equivalent to the rent or the rent from February 1, 2017 to February 4, 2017 (=1.80,000 won x 40,000 won remaining after deducting from KRW 20,00).
(4) If so, the Defendant is obligated to deliver to the Plaintiff the real estate indicated in the separate sheet, which is the object of the lease of this case, and the Defendant is obligated to pay to the Plaintiff the money calculated at the rate of KRW 1.8 million per month from February 5, 2017 to the completion date of delivery of the real estate
B. The Plaintiff filed a request for a change in the name of business license had a license for food service business in the real estate listed in the attached list, and allowed the Plaintiff to run an entertainment tavern business under the name of the Defendant as the lessee during the lease term in this case.