A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant is a person engaging in driving service of a car BK3 vehicle.

On October 11, 2015, the defendant driven the above K3 car on the 22:10 on the 10th day of October, 2015, and came to turn to the left at the emulgal comprehensive stadium at the emulgic Central Hospital according to the front road of the emulgic C.

At the time, at the first lane designated as the left-hand turn line, a motor vehicle with D-hand turn has already stopped and waiting for signal, so there was a duty of care to make a left-hand turn according to the low-hand car with the driver's license.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and neglected to turn to the left on the second line, and received the front portion of the passenger vehicle in front of the right side of the vehicle in K3 with the left side of the vehicle.

After all, the Defendant, by the above occupational negligence, escaped without taking necessary measures even after destroying and damaging approximately KRW 561,031 of the repair cost for a passenger car owned by E.

2. On October 11, 2015, the Defendant: (a) arrested a flagrant offender and arrived at the G police box on the front of the F on the road of the F in terms of the facts described in paragraph (1), etc.; (b) left the patrol car and arrived at the patrol car; and (c) left the patrol car and was in front of the patrol car.

G The police officer affiliated with the G police box “I see, sing, sing, and bb by drinking;

In any way it misleads what he knows;

While taking the bath that “I shall do so by killing all of them,” assaulted Ha by hand, such as pushing H with a hand, kniting KON.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the police officer's 112 report processing and lawful execution of duties concerning arrest of flagrant offenders.

3. On October 11, 2015, the police officer I belonging to a G police box that violates the Road Traffic Act (refluence of alcohol measurement) was drunkly driven by the Defendant at the place specified in paragraph (1), at the G police box located in the G police box located in the GJ from around 22:30 to 22:50 on the same day.

It is judged that there are reasonable grounds to view the defendant, and the defendant has entered approximately 20 minutes of drinking.