logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2017.05.18 2015가합110875
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The defendant shall set forth the plaintiffs in attached Form 2. The sum of the amount of figures in attached Form 2. The defendant shall be the corresponding gold source and each of them.

Reasons

Basic Facts

1) The defendant is a housing reconstruction improvement project association established for the purpose of promoting a housing reconstruction improvement project in the Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Q. On May 6, 2009, the defendant obtained project implementation authorization from the head of Gangseo-gu Office on May 6, 2009 and obtained an apartment of 37 apartment units with 2,603 households with the size of 21st underground floor above the above area (hereinafter "the apartment of this case").

A project was implemented to build a new apartment and its ancillary and welfare facilities. The instant apartment was commenced on May 11, 201 and completed around January 201, 2014, and completed around June 2014. 2) The Plaintiffs were the Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government S apartment (hereinafter “Plaintiff apartment”)’s attached Form on January 2014, when the structural construction of the instant apartment was completed.

2. The damages list "(2) - Dong number" is the sectional owners of each household, and whether or not they reside at the time of completion of the structural construction of the apartment in this case is the same as the "(12) residential space."

Plaintiff

The current status of the apartment and the instant apartment and the instant apartment are located in all Class 2 through 3 general residential areas, and detailed location, arrangement, horizontal and vertical location relationship is attached Table 1.

3. The same shall apply to drawings; and

2) The 101, 122, 135, 136, and 138 units of the instant apartment that the plaintiffs reside with 101, 111, 116, 121, and 126 units of the instant apartment are 49.97m to 61.22m. The height of the plaintiff's apartment is 41.6m to 53.9m. The height of the apartment of this case is 49.01m to 51.64m (the existing 17.7m or 20m). The ground for recognition is the fact that there is no dispute, Gap's 1,2,3, and 4m (including the number of pages; hereinafter the same shall apply).

The written statements in Eul Nos. 3 and 8, the result of appraisal by appraiser T, the result of appraisal by the two appraisal corporations of this court, the result of entrustment of appraisal by the two appraisal corporations of this court, the purport of all pleadings

Judgment on the Defendant’s defense of this case

A. The defendant's assertion 1) The defendant is the U.S. association that implemented the plaintiff's apartment reconstruction project (hereinafter "the plaintiff's association").

and the instant case.

arrow