A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

At around 02:16 on September 27, 2016, the Defendant: (a) tried to look at the taxi articles E and taxi fares in front of the D Pharmacy in Mapo-si, Mapo-si; (b) tried to call back the taxi articles E and the taxi fares after receiving a report from a slope G affiliated with F of the Bapo-gu Police Station F, which called “Yna-gu, Mana-gu, Mana-gu, Hashes” to said G; (c) dump the sand on the floor to the face of G by gathering the sand on his hand; and (d) dump the flab of the said G, flapsing the flab and flabing the face of G; and (e) assaulted the g’s wall and the cellular phone.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of the above G 112 Report case, a police official.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police statement concerning G;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to work logs, photographs of damaged parts, records of handling 112 reported cases, and records of investigation reports;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of imprisonment, and the applicable law of criminal facts;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The execution of a sentence shall be suspended by taking into consideration favorable circumstances, such as the fact that the police officer whose reason for sentencing was sentenced to Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act wishes to find the wife, the fact that there is no penalty force exceeding a fine after being sentenced to a suspended sentence for about 15 years, and the fact that the wife and his/her children are responsible for supporting the wife and his/her children, and that they reflect in depth the wrongness with the lapse of the period of detention, but the execution of a sentence is deemed to have many criminal records of a fine due