logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울행정법원 2019.02.01 2018구합72567
정보공개처분취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

Details of the disposition

The plaintiff is a company that runs a general taxi transportation business after obtaining a license for passenger transportation business under the Passenger Transport Service Act.

Around June 18, 2018, the information disclosure decision B made by the Defendant against B filed a claim with the Defendant for the information disclosure on the details of fuel subsidies ( ① the details of transport employees’ LPG gas filling and fuel subsidies, ② the details of payment of fuel subsidies by vehicle number, ② the details of payment of fuel subsidies by vehicle number) from June 2013 to May 2018.

The Plaintiff notified the Defendant of his/her claim for disclosure of information from the Defendant and submitted his/her written opinion to the Defendant requesting non-disclosure of the said information. However, on June 29, 2018, the Defendant decided to disclose the details of the Plaintiff’s LPG gas charging and fuel subsidies by vehicle number from June 29, 2013 to May 2018, and notified the Plaintiff on the same day.

Around July 3, 2018, the information disclosure decision C made by the Defendant to C requested the Defendant to disclose the details of the payment of fuel subsidies (the details of LPG gas filling and fuel subsidies by vehicle number) from June 2015 to June 2018.

The Plaintiff notified the Defendant of the information disclosure claim by C, and submitted a written opinion to the Defendant requesting non-disclosure of the above information. However, on July 13, 2018, the Defendant decided to disclose the above information to C, and notified the Plaintiff on the same day.

(2) Each of the above claims filed by B and C for the disclosure of information in the instant case. Each of the above information disclosure decisions made by the Defendant against B and C shall be “the instant disposition,” and each of the above information that the Defendant decided to disclose was “the instant information.” 【The ground for recognition is without dispute, and the Plaintiff’s assertion as to the legitimacy of the instant disposition and the purport of the entire pleadings shall not be disclosed for the following reasons. Thus, the instant information pertaining to the Plaintiff’s assertion as to the legitimacy of the instant disposition is unlawful and revoked.

arrow