Defendant shall be punished by a fine of two million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won per day.

Punishment of the crime

around February 2016, the Defendant is the head of the Dispute Resolution Co., Ltd. entrusted with building management by the sectional owners of guest rooms in Jung-gu Seoul (hereinafter “instant hotel”).

On the other hand, around July 5, 2019, the execution of delivery of approximately 225 households of the above hotel's guest room building to each sectional owner by enforcement officer D belonging to the above court was completed with the judgment of Seoul Central District Court 2018Gahap54632, which won the case by filing a lawsuit against the administrator of the dispute resolution committee against the owner of the above hotel's company.

1. Infringement on the effect of compulsory execution;

(a) August 12, 2019; and

8. No person shall intrude on any real estate which has been expelled or delivered by any compulsory execution, or impair the utility of any compulsory execution by any other way;

Nevertheless, at around 11:00 on August 12, 2019, the Defendant instructed the employees E of the hotel in charge of the settlement of accounts, and around July 5, 2019, the number of guest rooms for which compulsory execution of real estate has been completed, to be removed. Accordingly, the above E removed from the erogate installed in the above hotel guest rooms F, G, H, I, J, H, K, H, M, N, N, and the 10 guest rooms installed in the total of 10 guest rooms. On August 14, 2019, the Defendant removed the erogate installed in the above hotel hotel guest rooms in which compulsory execution has been completed for each sectional owner by the aforementioned method.

Accordingly, the defendant conspired to remove the electronic fall of the real estate delivered by compulsory execution, thereby impairing the utility of compulsory execution.

(b) No person committing the crime on November 5, 2019 shall intrude into any real estate ordered or delivered by compulsory execution, or impair the utility of compulsory execution by any other means.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, around November 5, 2019, instructed employees S, etc. of the LAC to enter a Tho Lake with a completion of compulsory execution of real estate in the said hotel, to enter the said hotel and use TV installed in that hotel, and accordingly, the said S, etc.