logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2017.10.24 2016가단200252
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The plaintiff's claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. As to the claim against the defendant B

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion that Defendant B had committed the following illegal acts against the Plaintiff, and thus, the Plaintiff is obligated to pay damages to the Plaintiff.

① Defendant B filed a criminal charge against the Plaintiff on the charge of indecent act by compulsion and confinement by force, in order to protect the Plaintiff’s relationship with Defendant C from being known to the company and home, but such accusation was false, thereby impairing the Plaintiff, impairing the reputation, and insulting the Defendant C.

② Defendant B committed an indecent act against the Plaintiff, such as rhythizing the Plaintiff’s chest at any time on the window, and talked with another person to feel a sense of shameing against the Plaintiff.

③ On August 27, 2015, Defendant B testified as the witness of the Plaintiff at the relevant trial on the ground that he/she testified D and E, who was the Plaintiff’s witness, and made a threat and intimidation to the witness.

B. According to the evidence evidence No. 3 of the Daejeon District Prosecutor’s Office, the prosecutor in charge of the Daejeon District Prosecutor’s Office, on August 21, 2015, determined on August 21, 2015 that he/she did not have the right to institute a prosecution against the Plaintiff’s indecent act by compulsion, and that he/she did not have the right to institute a prosecution against the charge of confinement despite the fact that he/she did not have the right to institute a prosecution against the Defendant B, but there is insufficient evidence to acknowledge the fact that he/she committed defamation or insult

In addition, the data submitted by the Plaintiff alone is insufficient to recognize the fact that Defendant B committed sexually indecent act against the Plaintiff and threatened or threatened a witness, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it.

Therefore, the plaintiff's claim against the defendant B is without merit.

2. As to the claim against the defendant C

A. On April 5, 2012, Defendant C, while the relationship with Defendant B was known to the company and was in conflict with the Plaintiff, saying, at the company office around 10:30, Defendant C, the Plaintiff, at around April 5, 2012, the term “Il, Ill, Ild, Ild, Ild, Ild, Ild, Ild, Ild, Ild the Plaintiff.”

arrow