The sentence against the accused shall be determined by a fine of two million won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine.

Punishment of the crime

On January 22, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to two years of imprisonment for insult, etc. in the Daejeon District Court’s Incheon District Court’s Branch on January 22, 2015, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on January 30, 2015.

1. On March 29, 2014, the Defendant destroyed property damage by digging out the closed language on the ground that the victim C does not open the doors at the entrance of the main points located in Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seocheon-si, Seo-gu, Seoul, and damaged the entrance doors equivalent to 120,000 won at the market price owned by the victim.

2. Around March 29, 2014, the Defendant insultingd the victim H, who is a public official belonging to the G District police officer, who was dispatched after receiving a report, from three persons, such as F, in front of the building in Northern-gu E, Seocho-gu, Yancheon-si, and received a report, as of March 29, 2014. The Defendant sexually insultingd the victim by referring to a large sound, such as the fluort, the fluore, and the fluore bit of a bitch.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police with H;

1. A statement of reference witnesses of the F;

1. Investigation report-Attachment of photographic data, and confirmation of the victim suffering from damage to property;

1. On-site photographs;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a copy of the judgment of ex post facto competition [the High Court of Daejeon District (2014 High Court of 604, High Court of 2014, High Court of 940, High Court of 2014)]

1. Relevant Article 366 of the Criminal Act, Article 311 of the Criminal Act, and the selection of each fine for the crime;

1. After Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Article 39 (1) of the same Act:

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds of sentencing of the instant crime, the form and degree of the instant crime, the records of the criminal punishment by the Defendant, the fact that the Defendant recognizes and reflects the Defendant’s criminal act, the fact that the Defendant compensated for damage to property, equity in the case where the judgment was rendered simultaneously with the offense of insult, and other circumstances shown in the instant public trial, including the Defendant’s age, sexual conduct, environment, etc., shall be determined as per Disposition by taking full account of the