A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. From August 29, 2014 to August 31, 2014, the Defendant: (a) expressed that, “E” in the front of the “E” operated by the victim D who was in the Jung-gu Daejeon-gu Daejeon-gu, the Defendant was able to gather chills in the throughcopher, and was trying to go to the said victim, saying, “hing away the other person’s goods without the horse,” and said victim’s hinging, “hing the same year, hing, and on credit.” In doing so, the Defendant destroyed the property of the other party at least four times during the period from August 22, 2014 to August 31, 2014, as indicated in the attached list of crimes Nos. 3,4,6, and7.

2. On September 13, 2014, around 21:15, the Defendant interfered with the business of the Defendant at the emergency room of the Chungcheongnamnam University Hospital, where the victim F, who was 640, an ambassador Dong-dong, Daejeon, had been working on night duty, expressed complaints about why he was working on night duty as a matter of the preceding medical expenses, and among other patients and guardians, the Defendant interfered with another person’s business by force for about one hour, including: (a) interfered with the above victim’s night duty by force for about one hour, including where the victim F, who was working on night duty from August 4, 2014 to the above Si, as indicated in the table of crimes Nos. 1, 2, 5, 8, and 12 of the annexed Table 1, 2, and 12 of the annexed crime list, by force during the period from August 4, 2014 to the above Si.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement made to G, D, A, H, F, and I;

1. A place of business;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes for investigation reporting;

1. Relevant Article 314 of the Criminal Act and Article 366 of the Criminal Act (a point of interference with business) concerning criminal facts, the choice of punishment, and Article 314 of the Criminal Act (a point of causing destruction and damage, and a choice of

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. The extent of damage under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act is not excessive, and the degree of error is depth;